Debadeepta Dey wrote:
> I have never worked with eVC4 but will have to learn on the fly I
> guess. :)
eVC4 is based on VC5 so it is very similar to VC6.
In case you have VS2005 running, I'd suggest you that since it also
support Windows CE (PocketPC2003 and later). It is a lot more
comfortable to use and the compiler is ways better (faster binaries,
more C++ compliant and less bugs)...

Daniel

------=_Part_53957_22370388.1171451229361
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I had a question regarding the Windows CE build of ARToolkitPlus.

I have combined OpenCV libraries with my ART+ application. I am thinking of
mounting it on a VIA based embedded mini-itx series motherboard running
Windows CE to facilitate portability. Currently I am using the VC6 build on
Windows XP for my proof of concept testing. Is there any way of doing this?

I have never worked with eVC4 but will have to learn on the fly I guess. :)

PS: if this is too complex or time consuming can I run XP on a VIA C7 or C3
processor based mini-ITX motherboard? I have a Firewire camera.( Imaging
Source DFK 21F04)

-- 
Debadeepta Dey,
Research Intern,
Hitech Robotics Systemz,
India.

------=_Part_53957_22370388.1171451229361
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I had a question regarding the Windows CE build of ARToolkitPlus.<br><br>I have combined OpenCV libraries with my ART+ application. I am thinking of mounting it on a VIA based embedded mini-itx series motherboard running Windows CE to facilitate portability. Currently I am using the VC6 build on Windows XP for my proof of concept testing. Is there any way of doing this?
<br><br>I have never worked with eVC4 but will have to learn on the fly I guess. :)<br><br>PS: if this is too complex or time consuming can I run XP on a VIA C7 or C3 processor based mini-ITX motherboard? I have a Firewire camera.( Imaging Source DFK 21F04)
<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Debadeepta Dey,<br>Research Intern, <br>Hitech Robotics Systemz,<br>India.

------=_Part_53957_22370388.1171451229361--

------=_Part_54121_20055583.1171454208189
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Thanks Daniel. Will do that.

On 2/14/07, Daniel Wagner <daniel@i ...............> wrote:
>
> Debadeepta Dey wrote:
> > I have never worked with eVC4 but will have to learn on the fly I
> > guess. :)
> eVC4 is based on VC5 so it is very similar to VC6.
> In case you have VS2005 running, I'd suggest you that since it also
> support Windows CE (PocketPC2003 and later). It is a lot more
> comfortable to use and the compiler is ways better (faster binaries,
> more C++ compliant and less bugs)...
>
> Daniel
>
>


-- 
Debadeepta Dey,
Research Intern,
Hitech Robotics Systemz,
India.

------=_Part_54121_20055583.1171454208189
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Thanks Daniel. Will do that.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/14/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Daniel Wagner</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:daniel@i ...............">daniel@i ...............</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Debadeepta Dey wrote:<br>&gt; I have never worked with eVC4 but will have to learn on the fly I<br>&gt; guess. :)<br>eVC4 is based on VC5 so it is very similar to VC6.<br>In case you have VS2005 running, I&#39;d suggest you that since it also
<br>support Windows CE (PocketPC2003 and later). It is a lot more<br>comfortable to use and the compiler is ways better (faster binaries,<br>more C++ compliant and less bugs)...<br><br>Daniel<br><br></blockquote></div><br>
<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Debadeepta Dey,<br>Research Intern, <br>Hitech Robotics Systemz,<br>India.

------=_Part_54121_20055583.1171454208189--