| ARToolKit | Mailing List Archive |
|
| From: | TintonLab <tintonlab@g ........> | Received: | Jun 2, 2007 |
| To | artoolkit@h .................. | ||
| Subject: | ARToolKitPlus not detecting marker problem | ||
------=_Part_20998_7841594.1180744461715 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello, I'm working on integration of ArtooltKitPlus and another Tool. I've setup ARToolKitPlus for single marker detection with id markers. The Other tool outputs the image in "32 bit ARGB 8888" format. I've setup ARToolKitPlus Single Marker to receive images in PIXEL_FORMAT_BGRA and used a conversion funcion to convert ARGB to BGRA. Is there any way to know if the image is reaching ARToolKitPlus "calc" in the correct format? Thanks for your comment. ------=_Part_20998_7841594.1180744461715 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello, I'm working on integration of ArtooltKitPlus and another Tool. I've setup ARToolKitPlus for single marker detection with id markers.<br><br>The Other tool outputs the image in "32 bit ARGB 8888" format. I've setup ARToolKitPlus Single Marker to receive images in PIXEL_FORMAT_BGRA and used a conversion funcion to convert ARGB to BGRA. <br><br>Is there any way to know if the image is reaching ARToolKitPlus "calc" in the correct format?<br><br>Thanks for your comment.<br> ------=_Part_20998_7841594.1180744461715-- |
|||
| From: | Daniel Wagner <daniel@i ...............> | Received: | Jun 2, 2007 |
| To | ARToolKit Mailinglist <artoolkit@h ..................> | ||
| Subject: | Re: ARToolKitPlus not detecting marker problem | ||
TintonLab wrote: > Is there any way to know if the image is reaching ARToolKitPlus "calc" > in the correct format? There is no way to tell if the image is in "correct" format unless you get back a valid tracking result. I suggest stepping through the code to see how far the tracker gets. Does it find any rectangular regions at all? Does it find a valid marker? If yes, step through further to find how why the pose estimation fails... Daniel |
|||
| From: | TintonLab <tintonlab@g ........> | Received: | Jun 3, 2007 |
| To | artoolkit@h .................. | ||
| Subject: | Re: ARToolKitPlus not detecting marker problem | ||
------=_Part_39533_8096711.1180910005069 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello, It's solved. Sent an image with a pattern from the disk instead of the camera and it gave the pattern number correctly. So the problem is probably on the camera file. Thanks. On 6/2/07, TintonLab <tintonlab@g ........> wrote: > > Hello, I'm working on integration of ArtooltKitPlus and another Tool. I've > setup ARToolKitPlus for single marker detection with id markers. > > The Other tool outputs the image in "32 bit ARGB 8888" format. I've setup > ARToolKitPlus Single Marker to receive images in PIXEL_FORMAT_BGRA and used > a conversion funcion to convert ARGB to BGRA. > > Is there any way to know if the image is reaching ARToolKitPlus "calc" in > the correct format? > > Thanks for your comment. > ------=_Part_39533_8096711.1180910005069 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello,<br><br>It's solved. Sent an image with a pattern from the disk instead of the camera and it gave the pattern number correctly. So the problem is probably on the camera file.<br><br>Thanks.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote"> On 6/2/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">TintonLab</b> <<a href="mailto:tintonlab@g ........">tintonlab@g ........</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hello, I'm working on integration of ArtooltKitPlus and another Tool. I've setup ARToolKitPlus for single marker detection with id markers.<br><br>The Other tool outputs the image in "32 bit ARGB 8888" format. I've setup ARToolKitPlus Single Marker to receive images in PIXEL_FORMAT_BGRA and used a conversion funcion to convert ARGB to BGRA. <br><br>Is there any way to know if the image is reaching ARToolKitPlus "calc" in the correct format?<br><br>Thanks for your comment.<br> </blockquote></div><br> ------=_Part_39533_8096711.1180910005069-- |
|||