An Exploration of Virtual Auditory Shape Perception
![[Table of Contents]](/icons/button-contents.gif){kind=icon}
An Exploration of Virtual Auditory Shape Perception
Subject AH
Mean of Horizontal CMMA for Subject AH
-25 0 25
-25 25.64 20.769 34.095
0 31.404 23.947 30.871
25 40.965 27.1 40.543
Standard Deviation of Horizontal CMMA for Subject AH
-25 0 25
-25 18.409 10.884 23.297
0 15.59 11.269 20.501
25 26.926 31.43 17.837
Mean of Vertical CMMA for Subject AH
-25 0 25
-25 74.785 106.446 69.278
0 63.578 64.591 76.682
25 66.805 60.748 48.8
Standard Deviation of Vertical CMMA for Subject AH
-25 0 25
-25 10.236 32.568 12.812
0 36.518 31.591 54.52
25 53.662 23.298 13.764
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
AZ -25.000 0.000 25.000
ALT -25.000 0.000 25.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 68 MULTIPLE R: 0.322 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.104
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUARE DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
S
AZ 1508.858 2 754.429 2.163 0.124
ALT 745.257 2 372.628 1.069 0.350
AZ*ALT 235.441 4 58.860 0.169 0.953
ERROR 20574.934 59 348.728
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ ROW AZ 1 -25.000 2 0.000 3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 348.728 WITH 59. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 -8.731 0.000
3 2.500 11.231 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.318 1.000
3 0.932 0.155 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW ALT 1 -25.000 2 0.000 3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 348.728 WITH 59. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 1.906 0.000
3 9.368 7.462 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.946 1.000
3 0.376 0.431 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ ALT
1 -25.000 -25.000
2 -25.000 0.000
3 -25.000 25.000
4 0.000 -25.000
5 0.000 0.000
6 0.000 25.000
7 25.000 -25.000
8 25.000 0.000
9 25.000 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 348.728 WITH 59. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 0.000
2 5.764 0.000
3 15.325 9.561 0.000
4 -4.871 -10.635 -20.196 0.000
5 -1.694 -7.457 -17.019 3.178 0.000
6 1.460 -4.304 -13.865 6.331 3.154 0.000
7 8.455 2.691 -6.870 13.326 10.149 6.995 0.000
8 5.231 -0.532 -10.094 10.103 6.925 3.771 -3.224 0.000
9 14.903 9.139 -0.422 19.774 16.596 13.443 6.448 9.671 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 1.000
2 1.000 1.000
3 0.962 0.995 1.000
4 1.000 0.966 0.704 1.000
5 1.000 0.988 0.765 1.000 1.000
6 1.000 1.000 0.951 0.999 1.000 1.000
7 0.999 1.000 1.000 0.961 0.985 1.000 1.000
8 1.000 1.000 0.993 0.975 0.993 1.000 1.000 1.000
9 0.967 0.997 1.000 0.726 0.789 0.959 1.000 0.995 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
DIR$
L R
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 68 MULTIPLE R: 0.362 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.131
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUARE DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
S
DIR$ 3001.679 1 3001.679 9.930 0.002
ERROR 19951.297 66 302.292
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
AZ
-25.000 0.000 25.000
ALT
-25.000 0.000 25.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 63 MULTIPLE R: 0.427 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.182
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUARE DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
S
AZ 1598.938 2 799.469 0.694 0.504
ALT 4299.202 2 2149.601 1.866 0.165
AZ*ALT 5374.680 4 1343.670 1.166 0.336
ERROR 62211.741 54 1152.069
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 1152.069 WITH 54. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 8.872 0.000
3 -3.469 -12.342 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.697 1.000
3 0.963 0.542 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW ALT
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 1152.069 WITH 54. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 -15.219 0.000
3 -24.719 -9.499 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.367 1.000
3 0.151 0.694 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ ALT 1 -25.000 -25.000 2 -25.000 0.000 3 -25.000 25.000 4 0.000 -25.000 5 0.000 0.000 6 0.000 25.000 7 25.000 -25.000 8 25.000 0.000 9 25.000 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 1152.069 WITH 54. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 0.000
2 -11.208 0.000
3 -7.980 3.228 0.000
4 31.661 42.869 39.641 0.000
5 -10.194 1.014 -2.214 -41.855 0.000
6 -14.038 -2.830 -6.058 -45.699 -3.844 0.000
7 -5.507 5.700 2.472 -37.169 4.686 8.530 0.000
8 1.897 13.104 9.877 -29.765 12.091 15.934 7.404 0.000
9 -25.985 -14.778 -18.005 -57.646 -15.791 -11.948 -20.478 -27.882 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 1.000
2 1.000 1.000
3 1.000 1.000 1.000
4 0.840 0.243 0.612 1.000
5 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.111 1.000
6 0.999 1.000 1.000 0.175 1.000 1.000
7 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.689 1.000 1.000 1.000
8 1.000 0.998 1.000 0.788 0.998 0.994 1.000 1.000
9 0.984 0.999 0.999 0.251 0.998 1.000 0.997 0.961 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
DIR$
B T
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 63 MULTIPLE R: 0.383 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.147
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUARE DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
S
DIR$ 11152.138 1 11152.138 10.475 0.002
ERROR 64940.642 61 1064.601
Subject
CD
Mean of Horizontal CMMA for
Subject CD
-25 0 25
-25 66.613 65.53 72.858
0 85.506 60.446 57.396
25 72.79 58.223 64.433
Standard Deviation of Horizontal CMMA for
Subject CD
-25 0 25
-25 21.386 37.038 12.226
0 42.563 25.539 14.081
25 33.26 21.428 7.558
Mean of Vertical CMMA for Subject
CD
-25 0 25
-25 71.97 101.91 75.35
0 90.605 60.763 38.063
25 51.375 85.029 36.24
Standard Deviation of Vertical CMMA for
Subject CD
-25 0 25
-25 32.297 49.333 45.292
0 31.136 36.091 25.889
25 27.578 42.28 14.013
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
AZ -25.000 0.000 25.000
ALT -25.000 0.000 25.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 65 MULTIPLE R: 0.316 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.100
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
AZ 1731.457 2 865.729 1.164 0.320
ALT 86.674 2 43.337 0.058 0.943
AZ*ALT 1745.423 4 436.356 0.586 0.674
ERROR 41665.657 56 744.030
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ 1 -25.000 2 0.000 3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 744.030 WITH 56. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 -13.570 0.000
3 -10.074 3.496 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.289 1.000
3 0.590 0.918 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW ALT
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 744.030 WITH 56. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 -0.551 0.000
3 -3.185 -2.634 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.998 1.000
3 0.948 0.953 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ ALT
1 -25.000 -25.000
2 -25.000 0.000
3 -25.000 25.000
4 0.000 -25.000
5 0.000 0.000
6 0.000 25.000
7 25.000 -25.000
8 25.000 0.000
9 25.000 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 744.030 WITH 56. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 0.000
2 18.893 0.000
3 6.178 -12.716 0.000
4 -1.082 -19.976 -7.260 0.000
5 -6.167 -25.060 -12.344 -5.084 0.000
6 -8.390 -27.283 -14.567 -7.307 -2.223 0.000
7 6.245 -12.648 0.067 7.327 12.412 14.635 0.000
8 -9.216 -28.109 -15.394 -8.134 -3.050 -0.827 -15.461 0.000
9 -2.180 -21.073 -8.358 -1.097 3.987 6.210 -8.425 7.036 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 1.000
2 0.971 1.000
3 1.000 0.998 1.000
4 1.000 0.887 1.000 1.000
5 1.000 0.498 0.996 1.000 1.000
6 1.000 0.636 0.995 1.000 1.000 1.000
7 1.000 0.998 1.000 1.000 0.996 0.994 1.000
8 1.000 0.556 0.991 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.991 1.000
9 1.000 0.946 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
DIR$
L R
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 65 MULTIPLE R: 0.136 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.018
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
DIR$ 850.426 1 850.426 1.179 0.282
ERROR 45434.373 63 721.181
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
AZ
-25.000 0.000 25.000
ALT
-25.000 0.000 25.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 67 MULTIPLE R: 0.515 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.266
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
AZ 9559.203 2 4779.601 3.566 0.035
ALT 5302.874 2 2651.437 1.978 0.148
AZ*ALT 11168.826 4 2792.207 2.083 0.095
ERROR 77733.908 58 1340.240
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 1340.240 WITH 58. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 11.250 0.000
3 -21.433 -32.683 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.606 1.000
3 0.289 0.026 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW ALT
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 1340.240 WITH 58. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 -19.933 0.000
3 -25.529 -5.595 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.215 1.000
3 0.175 0.892 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ ALT 1 -25.000 -25.000 2 -25.000 0.000 3 -25.000 25.000 4 0.000 -25.000 5 0.000 0.000 6 0.000 25.000 7 25.000 -25.000 8 25.000 0.000 9 25.000 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 1340.240 WITH 58. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 0.000
2 18.635 0.000
3 -20.595 -39.230 0.000
4 29.940 11.305 50.535 0.000
5 -11.208 -29.843 9.387 -41.148 0.000
6 13.059 -5.576 33.654 -16.881 24.266 0.000
7 3.380 -15.255 23.975 -26.560 14.588 -9.679 0.000
8 -33.908 -52.543 -13.313 -63.848 -22.700 -46.966 -37.288 0.000
9 -35.730 -54.365 -15.135 -65.670 -24.523 -48.789 -39.110 -1.823 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 1.000
2 0.995 1.000
3 0.997 0.714 1.000
4 0.916 0.999 0.386 1.000
5 1.000 0.584 1.000 0.175 1.000
6 1.000 1.000 0.850 0.991 0.809 1.000
7 1.000 0.999 0.991 0.957 0.998 1.000 1.000
8 0.845 0.118 1.000 0.024 0.859 0.224 0.766 1.000
9 0.934 0.424 1.000 0.189 0.975 0.571 0.894 1.000 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
DIR$
B T
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 67 MULTIPLE R: 0.038 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.001
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
DIR$ 155.052 1 155.052 0.095 0.758
ERROR 105699.590 65 1626.148
Subject KH
Mean of Horizontal CMMA for
Subject KH
-25 0 25
-25 79.615 69.164 37.735
0 65.206 56.119 49.164
25 102.615 58.275 85.945
Standard Deviation of Horizontal CMMA for
Subject KH
-25 0 25
-25 26.737 20.313 20.887
0 51.926 27.286 27.623
25 56.264 34.065 29.753
Mean of Vertical CMMA for Subject
KH
-25 0 25
-25 103.79 91.11 95.128
0 84.718 69.003 68.827
25 56.97 66.063 42.293
Standard Deviation of Vertical CMMA for
Subject KH
-25 0 25
-25 17.954 29.95 19.734
0 44.963 30.52 32.862
25 49.707 30.51 35.284
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
AZ
-25.000 0.000 25.000
ALT
-25.000 0.000 25.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 57 MULTIPLE R: 0.450 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.202
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
AZ 4005.362 2 2002.681 2.125 0.131
ALT 4479.066 2 2239.533 2.376 0.104
AZ*ALT 5018.970 4 1254.742 1.331 0.272
ERROR 45240.546 48 942.511
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 942.511 WITH 48. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 -21.293 0.000
3 -24.864 -3.571 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.173 1.000
3 0.143 0.935 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW ALT
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 942.511 WITH 48. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 -5.341 0.000
3 20.107 25.448 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.864 1.000
3 0.263 0.088 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ ALT 1 -25.000 -25.000 2 -25.000 0.000 3 -25.000 25.000 4 0.000 -25.000 5 0.000 0.000 6 0.000 25.000 7 25.000 -25.000 8 25.000 0.000 9 25.000 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 942.511 WITH 48. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 0.000
2 -14.409 0.000
3 23.000 37.409 0.000
4 -10.451 3.958 -33.451 0.000
5 -23.496 -9.087 -46.496 -13.044 0.000
6 -21.340 -6.931 -44.340 -10.889 2.156 0.000
7 -41.880 -27.471 -64.880 -31.429 -18.384 -20.540 0.000
8 -30.451 -16.042 -53.451 -19.999 -6.955 -9.111 11.429 0.000
9 6.330 20.739 -16.670 16.781 29.826 27.670 48.210 36.781 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 1.000
2 0.999 1.000
3 0.994 0.869 1.000
4 1.000 1.000 0.900 1.000
5 0.901 1.000 0.534 0.985 1.000
6 0.975 1.000 0.702 0.999 1.000 1.000
7 0.598 0.916 0.287 0.760 0.975 0.980 1.000
8 0.809 0.992 0.440 0.938 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
9 1.000 0.983 0.999 0.992 0.714 0.894 0.409 0.610 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
DIR$
L R
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 57 MULTIPLE R: 0.033 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.001
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
DIR$ 62.937 1 62.937 0.061 0.806
ERROR 56650.550 55 1030.010
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
AZ
-25.000 0.000 25.000
ALT
-25.000 0.000 25.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 62 MULTIPLE R: 0.421 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.178
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
AZ 1072.806 2 536.403 0.473 0.625
ALT 11015.467 2 5507.733 4.861 0.012
AZ*ALT 1758.892 4 439.723 0.388 0.816
ERROR 60045.566 53 1132.935
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 1132.935 WITH 53. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 -6.434 0.000
3 -13.077 -6.642 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.837 1.000
3 0.597 0.830 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW ALT
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 1132.935 WITH 53. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 -22.493 0.000
3 -41.567 -19.074 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.130 1.000
3 0.008 0.226 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ ALT 1 -25.000 -25.000 2 -25.000 0.000 3 -25.000 25.000 4 0.000 -25.000 5 0.000 0.000 6 0.000 25.000 7 25.000 -25.000 8 25.000 0.000 9 25.000 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 1132.935 WITH 53. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 0.000
2 -19.073 0.000
3 -46.820 -27.748 0.000
4 -12.680 6.393 34.140 0.000
5 -34.787 -15.715 12.033 -22.107 0.000
6 -37.728 -18.655 9.093 -25.048 -2.940 0.000
7 -8.663 10.410 38.158 4.018 26.125 29.065 0.000
8 -34.963 -15.890 11.857 -22.283 -0.176 2.765 -26.300 0.000
9 -61.497 -42.424 -14.677 -48.817 -26.710 -23.769 -52.834 -26.534 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 1.000
2 0.995 1.000
3 0.668 0.912 1.000
4 1.000 1.000 0.769 1.000
5 0.773 0.973 0.999 0.835 1.000
6 0.770 0.970 1.000 0.856 1.000 1.000
7 1.000 1.000 0.799 1.000 0.894 0.889 1.000
8 0.848 0.991 1.000 0.933 1.000 1.000 0.942 1.000
9 0.398 0.642 1.000 0.457 0.936 0.980 0.514 0.965 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
DIR$
B T
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 62 MULTIPLE R: 0.023 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.001
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
DIR$ 37.002 1 37.002 0.030 0.862
ERROR 72971.082 60 1216.185
SUBJECT KS
Mean of Horizontal CMMA for Subject KS
-25 0 25
-25 24.903 48.161 12.973
0 34.05 39.058 51.426
25 10.787 57.896 39.107
Standard Deviation of Horizontal CMMA for Subject KS
-25 0 25
-25 20.984 43.933 12.202
0 26.635 33.343 28.454
25 14.853 40.578 32.106
Mean of Vertical CMMA for Subject
KS
-25 0 25
-25 37.33 20.323 36.89
0 7.963 17.529 5.9
25 0.025 3.007 0.635
Standard Deviation of Vertical CMMA for
Subject KS
-25 0 25
-25 32.255 23.552 37.423
0 13.603 15.416 5.212
25 0.007 4.975 0.318
Influence Of Altitude And Azimuth Position On Horizontal Passing Point
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
AZ
-25.000 0.000 25.000
ALT
-25.000 0.000 25.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 55 MULTIPLE R: 0.392 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.154
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUARE DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
S
AZ 5152.456 2 2576.228 2.444 0.098
ALT 1366.915 2 683.457 0.648 0.528
AZ*ALT 5357.665 4 1339.416 1.271 0.295
ERROR 48481.256 46 1053.940
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 1053.940 WITH 46. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 25.125 0.000
3 11.256 -13.870 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.089 1.000
3 0.685 0.480 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW ALT
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 1053.940 WITH 46. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 12.832 0.000
3 7.251 -5.582 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.499 1.000
3 0.857 0.888 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ ALT 1 -25.000 -25.000 2 -25.000 0.000 3 -25.000 25.000 4 0.000 -25.000 5 0.000 0.000 6 0.000 25.000 7 25.000 -25.000 8 25.000 0.000 9 25.000 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 1053.940 WITH 46. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 0.000
2 9.148 0.000
3 -14.116 -23.263 0.000
4 23.259 14.111 37.375 0.000
5 14.156 5.008 28.272 -9.103 0.000
6 32.994 23.846 47.109 9.735 18.838 0.000
7 -11.929 -21.077 2.187 -35.188 -26.085 -44.923 0.000
8 26.523 17.376 40.639 3.264 12.367 -6.470 38.452 0.000
9 14.204 5.057 28.320 -9.055 0.048 -18.789 26.133 -12.319 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 1.000
2 1.000 1.000
3 1.000 0.983 1.000
4 0.964 0.997 0.762 1.000
5 0.997 1.000 0.896 0.999 1.000
6 0.843 0.950 0.560 1.000 0.965 1.000
7 1.000 0.991 1.000 0.815 0.931 0.621 1.000
8 0.925 0.988 0.673 1.000 0.995 1.000 0.734 1.000
9 1.000 1.000 0.976 1.000 1.000 0.997 0.985 1.000 1.000
Influence Of Starting Configuration on Horiontal CMMA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
DIR$
L R
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 55 MULTIPLE R: 0.060 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.004
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUARE DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
S
DIR$ 204.646 1 204.646 0.190 0.665
ERROR 57092.352 53 1077.214
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Influence Of Altitude And Azimuth Position On Vertical Passing Point
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
AZ
-25.000 0.000 25.000
ALT
-25.000 0.000 25.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 38 MULTIPLE R: 0.585 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.342
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUARE DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
S
AZ 11.477 2 5.738 0.017 0.983
ALT 4276.327 2 2138.164 6.382 0.005
AZ*ALT 1238.055 4 309.514 0.924 0.464
ERROR 9715.551 29 335.019
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 335.019 WITH 29. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 -1.487 0.000
3 -0.631 0.856 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.982 1.000
3 0.997 0.994 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ ROW ALT 1 -25.000 2 0.000 3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 335.019 WITH 29. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 -21.050 0.000
3 -30.292 -9.242 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.023 1.000
3 0.007 0.525 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ ALT 1 -25.000 -25.000 2 -25.000 0.000 3 -25.000 25.000 4 0.000 -25.000 5 0.000 0.000 6 0.000 25.000 7 25.000 -25.000 8 25.000 0.000 9 25.000 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 335.019 WITH 29. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 0.000
2 -29.367 0.000
3 -37.305 -7.938 0.000
4 -17.008 12.359 20.298 0.000
5 -19.801 9.566 17.504 -2.793 0.000
6 -34.323 -4.957 2.982 -17.316 -14.523 0.000
7 -0.440 28.927 36.865 16.568 19.361 33.883 0.000
8 -31.430 -2.063 5.875 -14.423 -11.629 2.893 -30.990 0.000
9 -36.695 -7.328 0.610 -19.688 -16.894 -2.372 -36.255 -5.265 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 1.000
2 0.578 1.000
3 0.413 1.000 1.000
4 0.946 0.992 0.929 1.000
5 0.756 0.996 0.937 1.000 1.000
6 0.376 1.000 1.000 0.941 0.943 1.000
7 1.000 0.596 0.428 0.953 0.776 0.393 1.000
8 0.307 1.000 1.000 0.945 0.932 1.000 0.324 1.000
9 0.434 1.000 1.000 0.940 0.948 1.000 0.450 1.000 1.000
Influence Of Starting Configuration on Vertical CMMA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
DIR$
B T
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 38 MULTIPLE R: 0.301 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.091
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUARE DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
S
DIR$ 1337.796 1 1337.796 3.585 0.066
ERROR 13434.260 36 373.174
Subject
RJ
Mean of Horizontal CMMA for
Subject RJ
-25 0 25
-25 29.04 13.335 17.893
0 36.848 18.433 19.062
25 45.065 10.537 16.843
Standard Deviation of Horizontal CMMA for
Subject RJ
-25 0 25
-25 28.946 17.586 7.86
0 29.337 17.16 8.131
25 16.086 9.222 14.379
Mean of Vertical CMMA for Subject
RJ
-25 0 25
-25 70.75 54.503 43.715
0 66.75 33.268 31.443
25 46.373 40.703 76.355
Standard Deviation of Vertical CMMA for
Subject RJ
-25 0 25
-25 13.576 20.968 31.934
0 31.185 18.205 12.087
25 21.495 23.227 14.92
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
AZ
-25.000 0.000 25.000
ALT
-25.000 0.000 25.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 58 MULTIPLE R: 0.508 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.258
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
AZ 4459.625 2 2229.813 6.669 0.003
ALT 187.160 2 93.580 0.280 0.757
AZ*ALT 578.183 4 144.546 0.432 0.785
ERROR 16383.881 49 334.365
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 334.365 WITH 49. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 -22.883 0.000
3 -19.052 3.831 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.002 1.000
3 0.033 0.827 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW ALT
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 334.365 WITH 49. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 4.691 0.000
3 4.059 -0.632 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.744 1.000
3 0.850 0.995 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ ALT 1 -25.000 -25.000 2 -25.000 0.000 3 -25.000 25.000 4 0.000 -25.000 5 0.000 0.000 6 0.000 25.000 7 25.000 -25.000 8 25.000 0.000 9 25.000 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 334.365 WITH 49. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 0.000
2 7.808 0.000
3 16.025 8.218 0.000
4 -15.705 -23.513 -31.730 0.000
5 -10.607 -18.415 -26.632 5.098 0.000
6 -18.503 -26.311 -34.528 -2.798 -7.896 0.000
7 -11.148 -18.955 -27.173 4.558 -0.540 7.356 0.000
8 -9.978 -17.786 -26.003 5.727 0.629 8.525 1.169 0.000
9 -12.197 -20.004 -28.222 3.508 -1.589 6.307 -1.049 -2.218 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 1.000
2 0.999 1.000
3 0.963 0.998 1.000
4 0.949 0.317 0.179 1.000
5 0.990 0.323 0.199 1.000 1.000
6 0.880 0.188 0.108 1.000 0.991 1.000
7 0.996 0.748 0.484 1.000 1.000 0.999 1.000
8 0.997 0.681 0.420 1.000 1.000 0.996 1.000 1.000
9 0.996 0.792 0.537 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
DIR$
L R
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 58 MULTIPLE R: 0.285 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.081
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
DIR$ 1797.849 1 1797.849 4.961 0.030
ERROR 20293.240 56 362.379
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
AZ
-25.000 0.000 25.000
ALT
-25.000 0.000 25.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 67 MULTIPLE R: 0.602 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.363
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
AZ 3348.380 2 1674.190 3.664 0.032
ALT 1938.876 2 969.438 2.122 0.129
AZ*ALT 6600.398 4 1650.099 3.611 0.011
ERROR 26501.595 58 456.924
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 456.924 WITH 58. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 -18.467 0.000
3 -10.787 7.680 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.025 1.000
3 0.377 0.512 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW ALT
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 456.924 WITH 58. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 -12.502 0.000
3 -1.846 10.656 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.176 1.000
3 0.971 0.280 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ ALT 1 -25.000 -25.000 2 -25.000 0.000 3 -25.000 25.000 4 0.000 -25.000 5 0.000 0.000 6 0.000 25.000 7 25.000 -25.000 8 25.000 0.000 9 25.000 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 456.924 WITH 58. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 0.000
2 -4.000 0.000
3 -24.378 -20.377 0.000
4 -16.248 -12.248 8.130 0.000
5 -37.482 -33.482 -13.105 -21.235 0.000
6 -30.048 -26.048 -5.670 -13.800 7.435 0.000
7 -27.035 -23.035 -2.658 -10.788 10.447 3.013 0.000
8 -39.307 -35.307 -14.930 -23.060 -1.825 -9.260 -12.272 0.000
9 5.605 9.605 29.983 21.853 43.087 35.653 32.640 44.912 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 1.000
2 1.000 1.000
3 0.794 0.824 1.000
4 0.944 0.964 0.999 1.000
5 0.053 0.012 0.969 0.317 1.000
6 0.362 0.284 1.000 0.930 0.995 1.000
7 0.689 0.707 1.000 0.996 0.993 1.000 1.000
8 0.102 0.054 0.970 0.494 1.000 0.995 0.991 1.000
9 1.000 0.998 0.561 0.762 0.014 0.162 0.445 0.035 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
DIR$
B T
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 67 MULTIPLE R: 0.406 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.165
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
DIR$ 6872.519 1 6872.519 12.864 0.001
ERROR 34725.066 65 534.232
Subject RM
Mean of Horizontal CMMA for
Subject RM
-25 0 25
-25 50.155 49.086 48.827
0 53.491 28.606 25.053
25 27.33 21.723 31.898
Standard Deviation of Horizontal CMMA for
Subject RM
-25 0 25
-25 12.343 39.652 9.069
0 25.692 14.204 12.008
25 16.051 16.418 6.001
Mean of Vertical CMMA for Subject
RM
-25 0 25
-25 61.555 61.614 69.553
0 81.13 80.931 91.291
25 75.457 93.397 78.238
Standard Deviation of Vertical CMMA for
Subject RM
-25 0 25
-25 37.744 36.202 16.174
0 52.91 36.428 29.193
25 35.625 41.386 66.503
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
AZ
-25.000 0.000 25.000
ALT
-25.000 0.000 25.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 56 MULTIPLE R: 0.559 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.313
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
AZ 780.023 2 390.011 1.061 0.354
ALT 2785.644 2 1392.822 3.788 0.030
AZ*ALT 1851.748 4 462.937 1.259 0.299
ERROR 17279.927 47 367.658
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 367.658 WITH 47. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 -10.520 0.000
3 -8.400 2.120 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.328 1.000
3 0.553 0.948 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW ALT
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 367.658 WITH 47. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 -13.639 0.000
3 -22.372 -8.733 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.114 1.000
3 0.027 0.440 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ ALT 1 -25.000 -25.000 2 -25.000 0.000 3 -25.000 25.000 4 0.000 -25.000 5 0.000 0.000 6 0.000 25.000 7 25.000 -25.000 8 25.000 0.000 9 25.000 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 367.658 WITH 47. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 0.000
2 3.336 0.000
3 -22.825 -26.161 0.000
4 -1.069 -4.405 21.756 0.000
5 -21.549 -24.885 1.276 -20.480 0.000
6 -28.432 -31.768 -5.607 -27.363 -6.883 0.000
7 -1.328 -4.665 21.497 -0.259 20.220 27.103 0.000
8 -25.103 -28.439 -2.278 -24.034 -3.554 3.329 -23.774 0.000
9 -18.258 -21.594 4.568 -17.189 3.291 10.174 -16.929 6.845 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 1.000
2 1.000 1.000
3 0.902 0.728 1.000
4 1.000 1.000 0.908 1.000
5 0.544 0.092 1.000 0.496 1.000
6 0.365 0.078 1.000 0.331 0.998 1.000
7 1.000 1.000 0.946 1.000 0.757 0.552 1.000
8 0.461 0.099 1.000 0.423 1.000 1.000 0.662 1.000
9 0.912 0.657 1.000 0.915 1.000 0.996 0.962 1.000 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
DIR$
L R
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 56 MULTIPLE R: 0.264 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.070
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
DIR$ 1750.970 1 1750.970 4.042 0.049
ERROR 23390.803 54 433.163
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
AZ
-25.000 0.000 25.000
ALT
-25.000 0.000 25.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 62 MULTIPLE R: 0.275 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.076
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
AZ 380.122 2 190.061 0.122 0.886
ALT 4030.675 2 2015.338 1.289 0.284
AZ*ALT 1358.687 4 339.672 0.217 0.928
ERROR 82837.508 53 1562.972
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 1562.972 WITH 53. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 5.933 0.000
3 6.980 1.047 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.901 1.000
3 0.894 0.996 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW ALT
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 1562.972 WITH 53. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 20.210 0.000
3 18.123 -2.087 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.274 1.000
3 0.468 0.987 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ ALT 1 -25.000 -25.000 2 -25.000 0.000 3 -25.000 25.000 4 0.000 -25.000 5 0.000 0.000 6 0.000 25.000 7 25.000 -25.000 8 25.000 0.000 9 25.000 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 1562.972 WITH 53. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 0.000
2 19.575 0.000
3 13.902 -5.673 0.000
4 0.059 -19.516 -13.843 0.000
5 19.376 -0.199 5.474 19.317 0.000
6 31.842 12.267 17.940 31.783 12.467 0.000
7 7.998 -11.578 -5.904 7.939 -11.378 -23.845 0.000
8 29.736 10.161 15.835 29.678 10.361 -2.106 21.739 0.000
9 16.683 -2.892 2.781 16.624 -2.693 -15.160 8.685 -13.054 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 1.000
2 0.997 1.000
3 1.000 1.000 1.000
4 1.000 0.991 1.000 1.000
5 0.993 1.000 1.000 0.963 1.000
6 0.931 1.000 0.999 0.825 0.999 1.000
7 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.988 1.000
8 0.946 1.000 1.000 0.850 0.999 1.000 0.992 1.000
9 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.999 1.000 0.999 1.000 1.000 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
DIR$
B T
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 62 MULTIPLE R: 0.154 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.024
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
DIR$ 2126.951 1 2126.951 1.459 0.232
ERROR 87493.958 60 1458.233
Subject TM
Mean of Horizontal CMMA for
Subject TM
-25 0 25
-25 30.35 29.691 38.56
0 19.59 18.977 18.016
25 28.555 35.509 27.72
Standard Deviation of Horizontal CMMA for
Subject TM
-25 0 25
-25 27.02 24.195 29.441
0 18.933 21.893 13.879
25 24.848 24.469 24.155
Mean of Vertical CMMA for Subject
TM
-25 0 25
-25 12.498 21.033 3.77
0 6.28 9.048 10.176
25 10.54 9.953 6.795
Standard Deviation of Vertical CMMA for
Subject TM
-25 0 25
-25 6.393 26.519 4.281
0 6.521 9.102 8.853
25 10.86 9.921 6.258
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
AZ
-25.000 0.000 25.000
ALT
-25.000 0.000 25.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 61 MULTIPLE R: 0.322 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.103
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
AZ 34.527 2 17.263 0.034 0.966
ALT 2195.461 2 1097.731 2.177 0.124
AZ*ALT 412.275 4 103.069 0.204 0.935
ERROR 26222.578 52 504.280
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 504.280 WITH 52. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 1.894 0.000
3 1.934 0.039 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.968 1.000
3 0.974 1.000 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW ALT
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 504.280 WITH 52. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 -14.006 0.000
3 -2.273 11.734 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.176 1.000
3 0.964 0.263 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ ALT 1 -25.000 -25.000 2 -25.000 0.000 3 -25.000 25.000 4 0.000 -25.000 5 0.000 0.000 6 0.000 25.000 7 25.000 -25.000 8 25.000 0.000 9 25.000 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 504.280 WITH 52. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 0.000
2 -10.760 0.000
3 -1.795 8.965 0.000
4 -0.659 10.101 1.136 0.000
5 -11.373 -0.613 -9.578 -10.714 0.000
6 5.159 15.919 6.954 5.817 16.531 0.000
7 8.210 18.970 10.005 8.869 19.583 3.051 0.000
8 -12.334 -1.574 -10.539 -11.676 -0.962 -17.493 -20.544 0.000
9 -2.630 8.130 -0.835 -1.971 8.743 -7.789 -10.840 9.704 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 1.000
2 0.999 1.000
3 1.000 0.999 1.000
4 1.000 0.995 1.000 1.000
5 0.996 1.000 0.997 0.976 1.000
6 1.000 0.919 1.000 1.000 0.771 1.000
7 1.000 0.912 0.999 0.999 0.812 1.000 1.000
8 0.997 1.000 0.998 0.987 1.000 0.870 0.869 1.000
9 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.999 1.000 0.999 0.999 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
DIR$
L R
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 61 MULTIPLE R: 0.233 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.054
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
DIR$ 1589.083 1 1589.083 3.390 0.071
ERROR 27660.629 59 468.824
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
AZ
-25.000 0.000 25.000
ALT
-25.000 0.000 25.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 62 MULTIPLE R: 0.365 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.133
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
AZ 349.161 2 174.580 1.113 0.336
ALT 149.195 2 74.597 0.475 0.624
AZ*ALT 642.185 4 160.546 1.023 0.404
ERROR 8316.245 53 156.910
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 156.910 WITH 53. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 3.572 0.000
3 -2.859 -6.431 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.656 1.000
3 0.846 0.345 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW ALT
1 -25.000
2 0.000
3 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 156.910 WITH 53. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3
1 0.000
2 -3.932 0.000
3 -3.337 0.595 0.000
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3
1 1.000
2 0.606 1.000
3 0.792 0.991 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COL/ROW AZ ALT 1 -25.000 -25.000 2 -25.000 0.000 3 -25.000 25.000 4 0.000 -25.000 5 0.000 0.000 6 0.000 25.000 7 25.000 -25.000 8 25.000 0.000 9 25.000 25.000
USING LEAST SQUARES MEANS.
POST HOC TEST OF PASSINGP
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USING MODEL MSE OF 156.910 WITH 53. DF.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE MEAN DIFFERENCES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 0.000
2 -6.218 0.000
3 -1.957 4.260 0.000
4 8.535 14.753 10.493 0.000
5 -3.450 2.768 -1.492 -11.98 0.000
5
6 -2.545 3.673 -0.588 -11.08 0.905 0.000
0
7 -8.728 -2.510 -6.770 -17.26 -5.278 -6.183 0.000
3
8 -2.322 3.896 -0.364 -10.85 1.128 0.223 6.406 0.000
7
9 -5.702 0.515 -3.745 -14.23 -2.253 -3.157 3.025 -3.381 0.000
8
TUKEY HSD MULTIPLE COMPARISONS.
MATRIX OF PAIRWISE COMPARISON PROBABILITIES:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 1.000
2 0.997 1.000
3 1.000 1.000 1.000
4 0.970 0.375 0.905 1.000
5 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.389 1.000
6 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.702 1.000 1.000
7 0.986 1.000 0.997 0.390 0.997 0.996 1.000
8 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.759 1.000 1.000 0.996 1.000
9 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.878 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEVELS ENCOUNTERED DURING PROCESSING ARE:
DIR$
B T
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEP VAR:PASSINGP N: 62 MULTIPLE R: 0.050 SQUARED MULTIPLE R: 0.002
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
SOURCE SUM-OF-SQUAR DF MEAN-SQUARE F-RATIO P
ES
DIR$ 23.527 1 23.527 0.148 0.702
ERROR 9570.241 60 159.504