See Table 4.5.
| Background | Investigated the effect of a meaningful/random manipulation on the reported presence and nulling measures. |
| Hypothesis | Both measures will record higher values for the meaningful condition. |
| Methods | A meaningful and random scene were compared, both at
48
FOV. There were two exposures to each
condition for each measure. A +90
vection-inertial phase angle was used on
all nulling measure trials. |
| Results | The test-retest correlation for both measures was about .80. The nulling measure found the predicted effect (p < .05). There was a trend for reported presence in the predicted direction (p < .10). |
| Conclusions | For the meaningful/random conditions, the nulling measure is self-consistent and agrees with prediction and a trend in the reported presence data. |