From: Niels Hilbrink <Hilbrink@nlr.nl>
Subject: Re: INDUSTRY:  Successful VR Apps
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 1996 08:50:59 +0100
Organization: National Aerospace Laboratory


John Alway wrote:

>           I must respectfully disagree.  VR technology has wider
>         and deeper application possibilities than does the venerable
>         helicopter and for much lower cost.   VR technology will help
>         engineers immensely.  It will become an indespensible aid to
>         model visualization so much so that no successful company will be
>         able to do without it.  It will aid in science, and complicated
>         procedures, such as surgeries.
> 

Well I agree that it (VR) might be of some help to engineers but not
the full immersive stuff, more in the line of a virtual display like
proposed by Ellis. Full immersion has great entertainment value, it
remains to be seen if people who really need VR on a regular basis
respond well to putting on a HMD every time. My two cents says they
won't.

As far as the helicompter analogy goes, sure your right the price tag
is a lot higher, but the correct comparison is not VR-User <->
Helicoper buyer but Aeroplane buyer (eg Cessna citation) <->
Helicopter buyer and VR user <-> simple 3D user. VR might have a
broader field of application than and Helicopter does, but then again
a airplane has a much more limited use normal computers, so the
comparison stands.

Even if VR might conquer the design world, or surgery world, etc. it
doesn't do so right now does it ?  I'm a dreamer myself, like I hope
most of the other people in this newsgroup, but I'm also an engineer
(well technically not, but I will be in about 5 months). What I'm
trying to say is that we need to start constructing application for
parts of the technical/scientific community that cannot do without
VR. It is there that VR will receive recognition not in the
entertainment business, they forget a toy as quickly as a new one can
be created. Take computers as a example, they migrated from the
scientific/military community on the 70s to the ordinary every day use
we know now.

Once again I argue for a the use of VR in place where it is absolutely
needed, sections of science for which VR is the ONLY way of doing it.

Best regards,
Nils

-- 
========================================================================
| I didn't really say all the things that I said. You probably didn't  |
| read what you thought you read.  Statistics show that this whole     |
| thing is more than likely just a hideous misunderstanding.           |
========================================================================

    Niels Hilbrink (RS NOP)     National Aerospace Laboratory (NLR)
    mailto:Hilbrink@nlr.nl      Voorsterweg  31,  8316 PR Marknesse
    (++31)(0)527 242259 (Home)  P.O. Box    153,  8300 AD Emmeloord
    (++31)(0)527 248724 (NLR)   the Netherlands

	http://www.xs4all.nl/~ripley/Niels/niels.html
