From: dsawdai@guitar.engin.umich.edu (Donald James Sawdai)
Subject: Re: TECH: Accommodation vs convergence in stereoscopy
Date: 27 Feb 1996 19:49:13 GMT
Message-ID: <4gvn7p$lls@srvr1.engin.umich.edu>
Organization: University of Michigan (CAEN)


From: dsawdai@guitar.engin.umich.edu (Donald James Sawdai)

In article <9602242100.AA13071@athena.ulaval.ca>, Marc Bernatchez <mbernat@gel.ulaval.ca> writes:
> 	Okay, did someone followed me up to here? He he, I hope so. To
> conclude, this discussion has some crucial importance because it will
> permits us to better analyze the way HMDs helmets should be designed
> on their optical side. More precisely, it will permits to answer the
> question regarding what should be the ideal virtual image plane
> distance. I.e., the distance at which the HMD's pictures are
> shown. Some HMD uses the infinity image plane approach, other uses a
> setting of a few meters from the observer's eyes.

Okay, I'll toss in my (totally unqualified) $0.02 worth...

I think that for practical application in HMDs (or random dot
stereograms or any other stereoscopic media), you need to consider
that the brain (and hence visual perception and optical motor control)
is adaptive.  Most people have a fixed accomodation/convergence
relationship "programmed" into their brain from many years of looking
at the real world, where you focus and converge on the same point in
3-space.  Even this isn't infallible, though.  Try looking at a bunch
of random ropes, let's say, outside (away from other objects), about
20 feet away from you.  You can focus on the ropes, but converging on
a specific rope is sometimes difficult (or try branches and leaves
high in trees, but the overlapping objects makes this case easier to
see).

Anyway, my point is that the brain can learn to converge at a wide
range of angles on a fixed accomdation in an HMD.  This is one reason
that it is easier to see stereoscopic images once you "get used to
looking in 3D," and experience workers in 3D can fuse the images much
quicker.

In an HMD, you are stuck with a fixed focal plane.  So accomodation
will give you no clue for the depth of objects in the image.  But for
untrained (per above) users, they (IMHO) will attempt to converge on
the focal plane by reflex.  So I would say that the focal plane should
be near the Z-median of your objects of interest.

-Don Sawdai
dsawdai@engin.umich.edu
