From: John Wann <J.P.Wann@READING.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: HUMAN-FACTORS: Immersion Studies
Date:         Thu, 3 Oct 1996 16:40:51 +0000
Message-ID:  <v01540b01ae7992f93fa0@[134.225.195.177]>


Ed Lantz <edlantz@aol.com. wrote:

> In engineering terms, VR is the classic "solution in search of a
>problem."   Where
> is the demand for immersive environments?  We are stuck with a solution
>looking for > a problem!

I recognise that Ed has a point. I would argue there are a number of
applications that could benefit from wide FoV or immersive displays,
but the list, at present, is not extensive.  Where I disagree is in
the manner in which immersive displays might be realised:

Ed wrote:

> Is an HMD the best solution?  Probably not.  A wide FOV
> projection display such as the Reality Centre will suffice.

I like the word "suffice"

Hands up everyone who has/had, or may be acquiring an HMD Hands up
everyone who's got a CAVE/SID

SIDs are grossly INEFFICIENT in their use of physical space and
computational resources and can only be justified if their usage is
very high (e.g. entertainment) or if the novelty value outweighs the
cost (e.g.  did Nintendo really need a display based on 8 hughes JVC
projectors to launch their new game?? No, but they probably didn't
care, provided that it had impact).

If a large corporation wants to provide elegant demo's of their
products, irrespective of cost, then a dedicated large screen-multiple
projector system may be a worthwhile investment.  If architects and
clinicians are going to use VR as a routine visualisation aid they are
not going to have access to such systems.

By locking the displays to the users perceptual systems (e.g. HMDs)
you make a very efficient use of both space and computational
resources.  Which is why you can generate quite a nice HMD immersive
display based around a PC for $3,000 and you need in excess of
$100,000 and a large dedicated space to contemplate a SID.

If you are trying to sell the SID-VR to business then sure you need a
pretty convincing case (and I haven't heard one yet) that justifies
how VR will bring "added value" that offsets the capital cost in a
very short time.  Its much easier to justify investing =A310,000 in
dual seat HMD syste= m so that companies can monitor their usage and
put a "toe-in the water" of taking the technology on-board.

As the VR industry moves away from HMDs it will severely limit the
market-place in which it can operate.

JW

*********************************************************
Dr John P. Wann < J.P.Wann@rdg.ac.uk>
**********************************************************
Action Research Laboratory:
Development, Rehabilitation, Immersive Virtual Environments
(Wann, Mon-Williams, Langaas, Smyth , Swapp, Wallis, Wadsworth)
Supported by: Action Research; EPSRC: European Commission

ARL - DRIVE
Department of Psychology
University of Reading
PO Box 238, Reading RG6 6AL, UK

     +44 1734 318532
=46x   +44 1734 316604
***********************************************************
