From: John Wann <J.P.Wann@READING.AC.UK>
Subject:  Re: TECH: telerobotic/presence application questions
Date:         Mon, 2 Sep 1996 12:37:58 +0000
Message-ID:  <v01540b05ae50829b3dfa@[134.225.195.177]>


>>And as for vergence...
>>after what distance does it become unnecessary to verge the sources
>>onto the subject.. pls let me know!

Marc Bernatchez <mbernat@gel.ulaval.ca> suggested:

> Stereopsis data become useless around 100 feet.
> <http://www.imaginative.com/VResources/vr_artic/marcb_ar/stereo/conv_an1.gif>


Depending on your remote sampling resolution, a 100ft may be the case
for a machine vision system, but for human perceptual judgments any
advantage of binocular viewpoints is negligible after 6m

(This is relative to IPD - e.g. if you double the remote camera
seperation [without vergence], then you will get useful information
out to 12m - but there appears to be quite rapid adaptation to this
rescaling so its not a magical-fix).

Most pertinant is the consideration of the consequence of verging
remote cameras and then presenting the images to a human observer via
an HMD/screens.  A few previous applications have got the projection
geometry badly wrong on this and you need to think the problem through
carefully.  We have a UK project funded to tackle the remote stereo
problem in interfacing a human observer to a remote (high-speed)
stereo robot head.

John W

*********************************************************
Dr John P. Wann < J.P.Wann@rdg.ac.uk>
**********************************************************
Action Research Laboratory:
Development, Rehabilitation, Immersive Virtual Environments
(Wann, Mon-Williams, Smyth , Langaas)

ARL - DRIVE
Department of Psychology
University of Reading
PO Box 238, Reading RG6 6AL, UK

     +44 1734 318532
Fx   +44 1734 316604
***********************************************************
