From: jae28485@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Jennifer A Ehrlich)
Subject: HUMAN-FACTORS: stereo sickness
Date: 12 Sep 1996 12:30:01 GMT
Message-ID: <518vo9$bl1@news.cc.ucf.edu>
Organization: University of Central Florida


There have been a few postings lately about peoples' preference for
stereoscopic HMDs. As a follow-up to that discussion, I'd just like to
note that we have found people have much more trouble with simulator
sickness in stereoscopic as opposed to monoscopic HMDs. Using the
Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ), we found that a stereoscopic
HMD made people significantly more nauseous than the monoscopic HMD.
Although the eye strain and disorientation subscales did not quite
reach statistical significance, if you look at the data, there is a
very obvious trend for the stereoscopic HMD to produce greater eye
strain and disorientation also.

(In case anybody's wondering, we did have an IOD calibration for each
individual, and we did have the software calculate views for each eye,
so no extra lag would occur in the stereo condition.)

-Jenny Ehrlich
jae28485@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu
or
ehrlichj@stricom.army.mil
______________________________________________________________________________

"You know, I used to think it was awful that life was so unfair. Then
I thought, wouldn't it be much worse if life were fair, and all the
terrible things that happen to us come because we actually deserve
them? So, now I take great comfort in the general hostility and
unfairness of the universe."

        -- Marcus to Franklin in Babylon 5

______________________________________________________________________________
