From: Stuart Alexander <Stuvr@CLASSIC.MSN.COM>
Subject: Re: APPS: Patent on VR Mental Conditioning Medium
Date:         Thu, 11 Sep 1997 14:20:58 UT
Message-ID:  <UPMAIL17.199709111422560126@classic.msn.com>


Regarding Dr. Giuseppe Riva's recent posting/concerns about a recently issued
patent for a "Virtual Reality Mental Conditioning Medium":

VERY interesting.......Methinks Mr. Sever has pulled off a good
one. It is well known in the VR community that this technology has
been used for some time (in both R&D and "real world"
environments). Apparently, and understandably, no one has previously
attempted to patent this. So.....we may not like it, but we can't
blame him...........HOWEVER......(my opinion only.....):

Upon close inspection of the wording of his patent, I feel his claim
is extremely vague (and no, I am NOT an attorney). For example, notice
the wording at the very beginning of the text (emphasis is mine): "An
article of manufacture for use with a virtual reality device
comprising a medium with a program imprinted thereon operable with the
device and designed for achieving a goal....."  What exactly does this
mean? Such a system is generally fairly straightforward (and obviously
with some variations): computer, VR program/world(s), tracker, HMD, an
I/O device of some kind for navigation possibly, and maybe even some
form of feedback device. Certainly Mr. Sever is not laying claim to
the computer, the tracker, the HMD, or even VR worlds. Is he talking
about some specific device, as yet undefined/unannounced? Is he
talking about a specific application delivered via CD-ROM?

The patent clearly refers to such an "article", and can obviously not
lay claim to the other components listed above. So......I wouldn't
worry about it.  Press on.

Stuart B. Alexander
President
Interactive Arts & Sciences, Inc.
Raleigh, NC
stuvr @ msn.com
