ARToolKit | Mailing List Archive |
![]() |
From: | bandit <bandit@c .........> | Received: | Oct 3, 2001 |
To | bandit@c ........., arforum@t ......... | ||
Subject: | Re: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking | ||
For the wireless 3DOF: I would suggest getting an Intersense (or other) 3DOF tracker, then getting a BasicStamp (parallax) to hook it up to (assumes serial communications) The BasicStamp would parse the position data into a more usable format. Then ... there are a couple of wireless (transmit/receive) solutions made just for the BasicStamp. Look in Circuit Cellar for these. You may need a BasicSTamp on the receiver side to act as a serial device to talk to your system. NOTE: This makes two assumptions: 1. you dont get the 3dof info from the 6dof tracker 2. the lag is acceptable. If you can pop for the $12K (or so) I would just go with the InterSense IS600. The IS900 should be able to handle the multiple folks. ... bandit Oliver Bimber wrote: >hi everyone, >for our Virtual Showcase setups, we're looking for an optical (and other >wireless) tracking solutions that support head-tracking (but possibly also >tracking of interaction devices). For head-tracking, we require 3D position >information, only. >However, for input devices we would need 6DOF. >The solution should be extendable to support multiple (up to four) users >simultaneously (we can use multiple networked PCs for this). If optical, >the solution should not be effected much by the lighting conditions, >surrounding the setup (e.g. IR or ultra-sonic). >Finally, it should be fast, stable, precise, cheap, easy to integrate, easy >to maintain, robust, and flexible ;-) >Does anybody know such a system? >Thanks, >--oliver >ps. don't take the last sentence too serious... >+--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ >| | |_|_|_|_| Oliver Bimber | URL: http://www.crcg.edu/ | >| __|__|_|_|_|_| Senior Researcher | EMAIL:obimber@c ....... | >| | |_|_|_|_| | | >| __|__|_|_|_|_| Human Media Technologies | | >| __ _ __ __| Fraunhofer CRCG, Inc. | | >| / /_// /_ | 321 South Main St. | PH :(+1) 401 453-6363 x124 | >| /_ / |/_ /_/ | Providence,RI 02903,USA | FAX:(+1) 401 453-0444 | >+--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ > > > > ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84Ao5.a9zIQj Or send an email To: arforum-unsubscribe@t ......... This email was sent to: webmaster@e ............ T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================ |
From: | yohan baillot <baillot@a ...............> | Received: | Oct 3, 2001 |
To | arforum@t ......... | ||
Subject: | Re: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking | ||
Dear Oliver, "fast, stable, precise, cheap, easy to integrate, easy to maintain, robust, and flexible" dont go together :) I will recommend Vicon myself for your requirements Then there are wired solutions that are from InterSense and 3DTech. Yohan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Oliver Bimber" <obimber@r .................> To: <arforum@t .........> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:30 AM Subject: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking > hi everyone, > for our Virtual Showcase setups, we're looking for an optical (and other > wireless) tracking solutions that support head-tracking (but possibly also > tracking of interaction devices). For head-tracking, we require 3D position > information, only. > However, for input devices we would need 6DOF. > The solution should be extendable to support multiple (up to four) users > simultaneously (we can use multiple networked PCs for this). If optical, > the solution should not be effected much by the lighting conditions, > surrounding the setup (e.g. IR or ultra-sonic). > Finally, it should be fast, stable, precise, cheap, easy to integrate, easy > to maintain, robust, and flexible ;-) > Does anybody know such a system? > Thanks, > --oliver > ps. don't take the last sentence too serious... > +--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ > | | |_|_|_|_| Oliver Bimber | URL: http://www.crcg.edu/ | > | __|__|_|_|_|_| Senior Researcher | EMAIL:obimber@c ....... | > | | |_|_|_|_| | | > | __|__|_|_|_|_| Human Media Technologies | | > | __ _ __ __| Fraunhofer CRCG, Inc. | | > | / /_// /_ | 321 South Main St. | PH :(+1) 401 453-6363 x124 | > | /_ / |/_ /_/ | Providence,RI 02903,USA | FAX:(+1) 401 453-0444 | > +--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ > > ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84Ao5.a9zIQj Or send an email To: arforum-unsubscribe@t ......... This email was sent to: webmaster@e ............ T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================ |
From: | Oliver Bimber <obimber@r .................> | Received: | Oct 3, 2001 |
To | arforum@t ......... | ||
Subject: | [ARFORUM] wireless tracking | ||
hi everyone, for our Virtual Showcase setups, we're looking for an optical (and other wireless) tracking solutions that support head-tracking (but possibly also tracking of interaction devices). For head-tracking, we require 3D position information, only. However, for input devices we would need 6DOF. The solution should be extendable to support multiple (up to four) users simultaneously (we can use multiple networked PCs for this). If optical, the solution should not be effected much by the lighting conditions, surrounding the setup (e.g. IR or ultra-sonic). Finally, it should be fast, stable, precise, cheap, easy to integrate, easy to maintain, robust, and flexible ;-) Does anybody know such a system? Thanks, --oliver ps. don't take the last sentence too serious... +--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ | | |_|_|_|_| Oliver Bimber | URL: http://www.crcg.edu/ | | __|__|_|_|_|_| Senior Researcher | EMAIL:obimber@c ....... | | | |_|_|_|_| | | | __|__|_|_|_|_| Human Media Technologies | | | __ _ __ __| Fraunhofer CRCG, Inc. | | | / /_// /_ | 321 South Main St. | PH :(+1) 401 453-6363 x124 | | /_ / |/_ /_/ | Providence,RI 02903,USA | FAX:(+1) 401 453-0444 | +--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84Ao5.a9zIQj Or send an email To: arforum-unsubscribe@t ......... This email was sent to: webmaster@e ............ T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================ |
From: | Greg Erdmann <gerdmann@a .................> | Received: | Oct 8, 2001 |
To | arforum@t ......... | ||
Subject: | [ARFORUM] wireless tracking | ||
Oliver (and Yohan): Please excuse me for the brief "sales-oriented" reply, but thought that it would be important for the AR community to know the following exists: Please also consider the fact that Ascension's new ReActor active-optical system is a great system to consider and may "meet" some of your requirements below depending on what your definitions are: 1. fast: report rate up to 120 Hz 2. stable, precise: accuracy +/- 2mm RMS and consistent throughout entire capture volume 3. Cheap: $89K, which includes 540 digital cameras in fixed frame 4. robust: No moving parts, all solid state (no camera lenses) 5. Flexible: Frame size is adjustable See: http://www.ascension-tech.com/products/reactor/ - Greg Erdmann -----Original Message----- From: yohan baillot [mailto:baillot@a ...............] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:23 PM To: arforum@t ......... Subject: Re: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking Dear Oliver, "fast, stable, precise, cheap, easy to integrate, easy to maintain, robust, and flexible" dont go together :) I will recommend Vicon myself for your requirements Then there are wired solutions that are from InterSense and 3DTech. Yohan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Oliver Bimber" <obimber@r .................> To: <arforum@t .........> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:30 AM Subject: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking > hi everyone, > for our Virtual Showcase setups, we're looking for an optical (and other > wireless) tracking solutions that support head-tracking (but possibly also > tracking of interaction devices). For head-tracking, we require 3D position > information, only. > However, for input devices we would need 6DOF. > The solution should be extendable to support multiple (up to four) users > simultaneously (we can use multiple networked PCs for this). If optical, > the solution should not be effected much by the lighting conditions, > surrounding the setup (e.g. IR or ultra-sonic). > Finally, it should be fast, stable, precise, cheap, easy to integrate, easy > to maintain, robust, and flexible ;-) > Does anybody know such a system? > Thanks, > --oliver > ps. don't take the last sentence too serious... > +--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ > | | |_|_|_|_| Oliver Bimber | URL: http://www.crcg.edu/ | > | __|__|_|_|_|_| Senior Researcher | EMAIL:obimber@c ....... | > | | |_|_|_|_| | | > | __|__|_|_|_|_| Human Media Technologies | | > | __ _ __ __| Fraunhofer CRCG, Inc. | | > | / /_// /_ | 321 South Main St. | PH :(+1) 401 453-6363 x124 | > | /_ / |/_ /_/ | Providence,RI 02903,USA | FAX:(+1) 401 453-0444 | > +--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ > > ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84Ao5.a9zINX Or send an email To: arforum-unsubscribe@t ......... This email was sent to: greg@a ................. T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================ Regards, Gregory S. Erdmann Global Account Manager Ascension Technology Corporation PO Box 527, Burlington, VT 05402 USA Tel: (802) 893-6657 Fax: (802) 893-6659 email: greg@a ................. web site: http://www.ascension-tech.com/ ftp site: ftp://ftp.ascension-tech.com/pub/ascension-tech.com/ Magnetic, optical and inertial motion tracking technologies for computer graphics applications. ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84Ao5.a9zIQj Or send an email To: arforum-unsubscribe@t ......... This email was sent to: webmaster@e ............ T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================ |
From: | Greg Erdmann <gerdmann@a .................> | Received: | Oct 8, 2001 |
To | Mark Palmer <M.W.Palmer@s ...........>, arforum@t ......... | ||
Subject: | RE: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking | ||
Mark, no I didn't take it the wrong way at all - it is good to stimulate conversation on this topic so tracker designers like us can develop what you folks need. Yes, ReActor was designed for full body motion capture. But with 30 markers, and only 3 needed to compute angles (Reactor is a position-only tracker), that is technically accommodating for up to 7-10 people with 3-4 markers on a head. Why 3 OR 4? A fourth marker is used to compensate if one of the others is occluded. The likelihood of two being occluded is very low. Also, with the 540 photo-detectors (digital "cameras") distributed evenly about the 12 bar frame, the coverage is fantastic and occlusion is minimized greatly to begin with. Furthermore, since the small radio pack (on the person being tracked) is sending out a time sequence of which marker is flashing, to the base-station computer, the markers are looking for the stationary detectors and occlusion is further minimized (opposite of the "cameras" looking for the moving markers as in a passive system). Right now, yes, we can only communicate with one radio pack, so this is the real limiting factor that one person can be used. Revision 2 of ReActor should be out Q2 2001 and that will be implemented. The capture volume will also be expanded as well. We are working on what the maximum range is now. And finally, we've been doing a beta program with our laserBIRD tracker recently which is going very well and could be an option depending on the AR application. Let me know if you want more info on that... Thanks - Greg -----Original Message----- From: mp3@s ........... [mailto:mp3@s ...........]On Behalf Of Mark Palmer Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 11:52 AM To: arforum@t ......... Cc: gerdmann@a ................. Subject: Re: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking Greg, I hope you don't take this the wrong way as what I've heard of the ReActor is that its a very good product but perhaps you could clear something up for the AR community. When I looked into the ReActor for this type of use I was told that it would support only one user as opposed to Oliver's request for "multiple (up to four) users". As far as I can see the issue is one of line of sight and occlusion (and the fact it is primarily designed for motion capture). But as far as simply tracking HMD's are concerned I imagine there shouldn't be too great a problem. I can't see why the ReActor couldn't be adapted for such use as long as one could get hold of the IR devices that are in the body suit to mount on a HMD etc. Are these now available for such a purpose? A second point is that the ReActor's active capture area was quite small (3x3x4m) has the company developed the system so that the basic area can be expanded so that users can be occupied as well as the virtual objects that they wish to examine? As you might imagine four users and for the sake of arguement a virtual car would be quite a tight squeeze. all the best Mark On Mon, 8 Oct 2001 09:20:13 -0400 Greg Erdmann <gerdmann@a .................> wrote: > Oliver (and Yohan): > > Please excuse me for the brief "sales-oriented" reply, but thought that it > would be important for the AR community to know the following exists: > > Please also consider the fact that Ascension's new ReActor active-optical > system is a great system to consider and may "meet" some of your > requirements below depending on what your definitions are: > 1. fast: report rate up to 120 Hz > 2. stable, precise: accuracy +/- 2mm RMS and consistent throughout entire > capture volume > 3. Cheap: $89K, which includes 540 digital cameras in fixed frame > 4. robust: No moving parts, all solid state (no camera lenses) > 5. Flexible: Frame size is adjustable > > See: http://www.ascension-tech.com/products/reactor/ > - Greg Erdmann > > > -----Original Message----- > From: yohan baillot [mailto:baillot@a ...............] > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:23 PM > To: arforum@t ......... > Subject: Re: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking > > Dear Oliver, > > "fast, stable, precise, cheap, easy to integrate, easy > to maintain, robust, and flexible" dont go together :) > > I will recommend Vicon myself for your requirements > > Then there are wired solutions that are from InterSense > and 3DTech. > > Yohan > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Oliver Bimber" <obimber@r .................> > To: <arforum@t .........> > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:30 AM > Subject: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking > > > > hi everyone, > > for our Virtual Showcase setups, we're looking for an optical (and other > > wireless) tracking solutions that support head-tracking (but possibly also > > tracking of interaction devices). For head-tracking, we require 3D > position > > information, only. > > However, for input devices we would need 6DOF. > > The solution should be extendable to support multiple (up to four) users > > simultaneously (we can use multiple networked PCs for this). If optical, > > the solution should not be effected much by the lighting conditions, > > surrounding the setup (e.g. IR or ultra-sonic). > > Finally, it should be fast, stable, precise, cheap, easy to integrate, > easy > > to maintain, robust, and flexible ;-) > > Does anybody know such a system? > > Thanks, > > --oliver > > ps. don't take the last sentence too serious... > > +--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ > > | | |_|_|_|_| Oliver Bimber | URL: http://www.crcg.edu/ | > > | __|__|_|_|_|_| Senior Researcher | EMAIL:obimber@c ....... | > > | | |_|_|_|_| | | > > | __|__|_|_|_|_| Human Media Technologies | | > > | __ _ __ __| Fraunhofer CRCG, Inc. | | > > | / /_// /_ | 321 South Main St. | PH :(+1) 401 453-6363 x124 | > > | /_ / |/_ /_/ | Providence,RI 02903,USA | FAX:(+1) 401 453-0444 | > > +--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ > > > > > > > Regards, > > Gregory S. Erdmann > Global Account Manager > > Ascension Technology Corporation > PO Box 527, Burlington, VT 05402 USA > Tel: (802) 893-6657 Fax: (802) 893-6659 > email: greg@a ................. <mailto:greg@a .................> > web site: http://www.ascension-tech.com/ <http://www.ascension-tech.com/> > ftp site: ftp://ftp.ascension-tech.com/pub/ascension-tech.com/ > <ftp://ftp.ascension-tech.com/pub/ascension-tech.com/> > > Magnetic, optical and inertial motion tracking technologies > for computer graphics applications. > > ************************************************ Dr Mark Palmer Arts & Humanities Research Board Fellow School of Art & Design College Road Staffordshire University Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DE tel: +44 (0)1782 294802 (direct) fax: +44 (0)1782 294873 M.W.Palmer@s ........... ************************************************ ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84Ao5.a9zIQj Or send an email To: arforum-unsubscribe@t ......... This email was sent to: webmaster@e ............ T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================ |
From: | Mark Palmer <M.W.Palmer@s ...........> | Received: | Oct 8, 2001 |
To | arforum@t ......... | ||
Subject: | Re: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking | ||
Greg, I hope you don't take this the wrong way as what I've heard of the ReActor is that its a very good product but perhaps you could clear something up for the AR community. When I looked into the ReActor for this type of use I was told that it would support only one user as opposed to Oliver's request for "multiple (up to four) users". As far as I can see the issue is one of line of sight and occlusion (and the fact it is primarily designed for motion capture). But as far as simply tracking HMD's are concerned I imagine there shouldn't be too great a problem. I can't see why the ReActor couldn't be adapted for such use as long as one could get hold of the IR devices that are in the body suit to mount on a HMD etc. Are these now available for such a purpose? A second point is that the ReActor's active capture area was quite small (3x3x4m) has the company developed the system so that the basic area can be expanded so that users can be occupied as well as the virtual objects that they wish to examine? As you might imagine four users and for the sake of arguement a virtual car would be quite a tight squeeze. all the best Mark On Mon, 8 Oct 2001 09:20:13 -0400 Greg Erdmann <gerdmann@a .................> wrote: > Oliver (and Yohan): > > Please excuse me for the brief "sales-oriented" reply, but thought that it > would be important for the AR community to know the following exists: > > Please also consider the fact that Ascension's new ReActor active-optical > system is a great system to consider and may "meet" some of your > requirements below depending on what your definitions are: > 1. fast: report rate up to 120 Hz > 2. stable, precise: accuracy +/- 2mm RMS and consistent throughout entire > capture volume > 3. Cheap: $89K, which includes 540 digital cameras in fixed frame > 4. robust: No moving parts, all solid state (no camera lenses) > 5. Flexible: Frame size is adjustable > > See: http://www.ascension-tech.com/products/reactor/ > - Greg Erdmann > > > -----Original Message----- > From: yohan baillot [mailto:baillot@a ...............] > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:23 PM > To: arforum@t ......... > Subject: Re: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking > > Dear Oliver, > > "fast, stable, precise, cheap, easy to integrate, easy > to maintain, robust, and flexible" dont go together :) > > I will recommend Vicon myself for your requirements > > Then there are wired solutions that are from InterSense > and 3DTech. > > Yohan > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Oliver Bimber" <obimber@r .................> > To: <arforum@t .........> > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:30 AM > Subject: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking > > > > hi everyone, > > for our Virtual Showcase setups, we're looking for an optical (and other > > wireless) tracking solutions that support head-tracking (but possibly also > > tracking of interaction devices). For head-tracking, we require 3D > position > > information, only. > > However, for input devices we would need 6DOF. > > The solution should be extendable to support multiple (up to four) users > > simultaneously (we can use multiple networked PCs for this). If optical, > > the solution should not be effected much by the lighting conditions, > > surrounding the setup (e.g. IR or ultra-sonic). > > Finally, it should be fast, stable, precise, cheap, easy to integrate, > easy > > to maintain, robust, and flexible ;-) > > Does anybody know such a system? > > Thanks, > > --oliver > > ps. don't take the last sentence too serious... > > +--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ > > | | |_|_|_|_| Oliver Bimber | URL: http://www.crcg.edu/ | > > | __|__|_|_|_|_| Senior Researcher | EMAIL:obimber@c ....... | > > | | |_|_|_|_| | | > > | __|__|_|_|_|_| Human Media Technologies | | > > | __ _ __ __| Fraunhofer CRCG, Inc. | | > > | / /_// /_ | 321 South Main St. | PH :(+1) 401 453-6363 x124 | > > | /_ / |/_ /_/ | Providence,RI 02903,USA | FAX:(+1) 401 453-0444 | > > +--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ > > > > > > > Regards, > > Gregory S. Erdmann > Global Account Manager > > Ascension Technology Corporation > PO Box 527, Burlington, VT 05402 USA > Tel: (802) 893-6657 Fax: (802) 893-6659 > email: greg@a ................. <mailto:greg@a .................> > web site: http://www.ascension-tech.com/ <http://www.ascension-tech.com/> > ftp site: ftp://ftp.ascension-tech.com/pub/ascension-tech.com/ > <ftp://ftp.ascension-tech.com/pub/ascension-tech.com/> > > Magnetic, optical and inertial motion tracking technologies > for computer graphics applications. > > ************************************************ Dr Mark Palmer Arts & Humanities Research Board Fellow School of Art & Design College Road Staffordshire University Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DE tel: +44 (0)1782 294802 (direct) fax: +44 (0)1782 294873 M.W.Palmer@s ........... ************************************************ ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84Ao5.a9zIQj Or send an email To: arforum-unsubscribe@t ......... This email was sent to: webmaster@e ............ T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================ |
From: | Mark Palmer <M.W.Palmer@s ...........> | Received: | Oct 9, 2001 |
To | Greg Erdmann <gerdmann@a .................> | ||
Subject: | RE: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking | ||
Hi Greg, > Mark, no I didn't take it the wrong way at all - it is good to stimulate > conversation on this topic so tracker designers like us can develop what you > folks need. Thanks for that and for clarify some of the issues surrounding the Reactor. It seems to me that the transmitter is the 'bottleneck' of the system in more ways than one. You mentioned 30 markers - I assume that this is the capacity of the system (if the notion I bring up later of switching between markers is correct I imagine that there will be a very real limit to the number of sensors). If this is the case and the transmitter 'bottleneck' were overcome one might be looking at a system that could track 7 users or an admixture of users and secondary devices. > Also, with the 540 photo-detectors (digital "cameras") distributed evenly > about the 12 bar frame, the coverage is fantastic and occlusion is minimized > greatly to begin with. Furthermore, since the small radio pack (on the > person being tracked) is sending out a time sequence of which marker is > flashing, to the base-station computer, the markers are looking for the > stationary detectors and occlusion is further minimized (opposite of the > "cameras" looking for the moving markers as in a passive system). What we appear to have here is a space frame that houses the IR sensors, presumably dealing with one sensor at a time (in its alloted position in the time sequence, and which is therefore too all intents and purposes stationary at that point in time). The radio link acts as a 'switch' which turns on each marker in turn, and at the same time passes that data to a base station where this data is collated and turned into a useable format. If this were the case I imagine that in order to minimise sensor 'lag' these would be switched through in a particular order to try and cluster these readings - but perhaps I'm completely off the mark here! > Right now, yes, we can only communicate with one radio pack, so this is the > real limiting factor that one person can be used. Revision 2 of ReActor > should be out Q2 2001 and that will be implemented. Was that 2001 or 2002? If my supposition is correct the problem faced by more than one radio pack would be to get each unit to take 'its turn' otherwise one would be asking the sensors to read multiple markers concurrently. I guess you'd have to get the packs to 'talk' to each other so that they could update each other as well as the base unit. If (big if!) this is the case I know nothing of how this might be done but as with things of this nature I'd imagine that thare will be a capacity for the system, the question is what will this be (if indeed there is one) and what is the projected cost of these units? The alternative might well be to get a wireless link to the markers themselves I guess that it depends on the type of app one is considering. > The capture volume will also be expanded as well. We are working on what the > maximum range is now. Again any notion of the anticipated range and cost of such an upgrade? > And finally, we've been doing a beta program with our laserBIRD tracker > recently which is going very well and could be an option depending on the AR > application. Let me know if you want more info on that... ......yes please. Thanks for your help and I look forward to your reply. all the best, Mark ************************************************ Dr Mark Palmer Arts & Humanities Research Board Fellow School of Art & Design College Road Staffordshire University Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DE tel: +44 (0)1782 294802 (direct) fax: +44 (0)1782 294873 M.W.Palmer@s ........... ************************************************ ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84Ao5.a9zIQj Or send an email To: arforum-unsubscribe@t ......... This email was sent to: webmaster@e ............ T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================ |
From: | yohan baillot <baillot@a ...............> | Received: | Oct 9, 2001 |
To | arforum@t ......... | ||
Subject: | Re: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking | ||
Dear Greg, is your system going to be wireless? can it be adapted to a CAVE? thanks Yohan ___________________________________________ Yohan Baillot VRLab / Naval Research Laboratory 4555 Overlook Avenue SE ______ Code 5580, Room 119A /\ \ Washington DC 20375 / \ \ Phone (202) 404 7801 / \______\ Mobile (703) 732 5679 \ / / Fax (202) 404 1122 \ / / baillot@a ............... \/_____ / http://ait.nrl.navy.mil/people/baillot/ http://ait.nrl.navy.mil/vrlab/projects/BARS/BARS.html ___________________________________________ ----- Original Message ----- From: Greg Erdmann To: arforum@t ......... Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 6:20 AM Subject: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking Oliver (and Yohan): Please excuse me for the brief "sales-oriented" reply, but thought that it would be important for the AR community to know the following exists: Please also consider the fact that Ascension's new ReActor active-optical system is a great system to consider and may "meet" some of your requirements below depending on what your definitions are: 1. fast: report rate up to 120 Hz 2. stable, precise: accuracy +/- 2mm RMS and consistent throughout entire capture volume 3. Cheap: $89K, which includes 540 digital cameras in fixed frame 4. robust: No moving parts, all solid state (no camera lenses) 5. Flexible: Frame size is adjustable See: http://www.ascension-tech.com/products/reactor/ - Greg Erdmann -----Original Message----- From: yohan baillot [mailto:baillot@a ...............] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:23 PM To: arforum@t ......... Subject: Re: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking Dear Oliver, "fast, stable, precise, cheap, easy to integrate, easy to maintain, robust, and flexible" dont go together :) I will recommend Vicon myself for your requirements Then there are wired solutions that are from InterSense and 3DTech. Yohan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Oliver Bimber" <obimber@r .................> To: <arforum@t .........> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:30 AM Subject: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking > hi everyone, > for our Virtual Showcase setups, we're looking for an optical (and other > wireless) tracking solutions that support head-tracking (but possibly also > tracking of interaction devices). For head-tracking, we require 3D position > information, only. > However, for input devices we would need 6DOF. > The solution should be extendable to support multiple (up to four) users > simultaneously (we can use multiple networked PCs for this). If optical, > the solution should not be effected much by the lighting conditions, > surrounding the setup (e.g. IR or ultra-sonic). > Finally, it should be fast, stable, precise, cheap, easy to integrate, easy > to maintain, robust, and flexible ;-) > Does anybody know such a system? > Thanks, > --oliver > ps. don't take the last sentence too serious... > +--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ > | | |_|_|_|_| Oliver Bimber | URL: http://www.crcg.edu/ | > | __|__|_|_|_|_| Senior Researcher | EMAIL:obimber@c ....... | > | | |_|_|_|_| | | > | __|__|_|_|_|_| Human Media Technologies | | > | __ _ __ __| Fraunhofer CRCG, Inc. | | > | / /_// /_ | 321 South Main St. | PH :(+1) 401 453-6363 x124 | > | /_ / |/_ /_/ | Providence,RI 02903,USA | FAX:(+1) 401 453-0444 | > +--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ > > ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84Ao5.a9zINX Or send an email To: arforum-unsubscribe@t ......... This email was sent to: greg@a ................. T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================ Regards, Gregory S. Erdmann Global Account Manager Ascension Technology Corporation PO Box 527, Burlington, VT 05402 USA Tel: (802) 893-6657 Fax: (802) 893-6659 email: greg@a ................. web site: http://www.ascension-tech.com/ ftp site: ftp://ftp.ascension-tech.com/pub/ascension-tech.com/ Magnetic, optical and inertial motion tracking technologies for computer graphics applications. ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84Ao5.a9zIQj Or send an email To: arforum-unsubscribe@t ......... This email was sent to: webmaster@e ............ T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================ ------=extPart_000_0017_01C150BB.E380CCA0-- |
From: | Armin Weiss <armin.weiss@a .............> | Received: | Oct 9, 2001 |
To | arforum@t ......... | ||
Subject: | Re: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking | ||
Dear Oliver, I know that the AR forum is not a PR forum, but I too (as Greg Erdmann did) would like to give a short "sales statement", that may be valuable for the AR community. A.R.T. is a german company. We produce a passive IR optical tracking system, "ARTtrack", that has been designed especially for VR/AR applications and that may fit quite well to your requirements: * passive Markers (i.e. wireless) * supports up to 10 Targets (6dof each; head, interaction device or other) * accurate: RMS = 0.25 mm and 0.12 deg in medium sized (3x3m) system * frame rates up to 60 Hz, delay ca. 25 to 40 ms * fast and easy to set up * system size is scalable * "self made targets" can easily be calibrated and tracked * can be used with "Crystal Eyes" shutter eyewear * wireless "Flying Joystick" is available I do not know if also the price will fit to your needs: a medium sized system, that covers a tracking area of about 3 x 3 meters, costs in the range of $ 50 K. For more informations: armin.weiss@a ............. Thanks, Armin Weiss, A.R.T. GmbH Oliver Bimber: > > hi everyone, > for our Virtual Showcase setups, we're looking for an optical (and other > wireless) tracking solutions that support head-tracking (but possibly also > tracking of interaction devices). For head-tracking, we require 3D position > information, only. > However, for input devices we would need 6DOF. > The solution should be extendable to support multiple (up to four) users > simultaneously (we can use multiple networked PCs for this). If optical, > the solution should not be effected much by the lighting conditions, > surrounding the setup (e.g. IR or ultra-sonic). > Finally, it should be fast, stable, precise, cheap, easy to integrate, easy > to maintain, robust, and flexible ;-) > Does anybody know such a system? > Thanks, > --oliver > ps. don't take the last sentence too serious... > +--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ > | | |_|_|_|_| Oliver Bimber | URL: http://www.crcg.edu/ | > | __|__|_|_|_|_| Senior Researcher | EMAIL:obimber@c ....... | > | | |_|_|_|_| | | > | __|__|_|_|_|_| Human Media Technologies | | > | __ _ __ __| Fraunhofer CRCG, Inc. | | > | / /_// /_ | 321 South Main St. | PH :(+1) 401 453-6363 x124 | > | /_ / |/_ /_/ | Providence,RI 02903,USA | FAX:(+1) 401 453-0444 | > +--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ > -- ___________________________________ Armin Weiss A.R.T. GmbH Gewerbestrasse 17 Rgb. D-82211 Herrsching Phone +49-8152-968530 Fax +49-8152-968501 e-mail armin.weiss@a ............. ___________________________________ ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84Ao5.a9zIQj Or send an email To: arforum-unsubscribe@t ......... This email was sent to: webmaster@e ............ T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================ |
From: | regenbre@g ..... | Received: | Oct 9, 2001 |
To | arforum@t ......... | ||
Subject: | Re: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking | ||
I do not want to change this forum into a promotion platform for specific products, but I just want to support the statement Armin Weiss gave. We are using two setups of the A.R.T. system at our laboratories with great success. The systems are incredibly accurate and have very low latency. The best tracking system (regarding quality of tracking) I know so far (compared to Polhemus, Intersense, Ascension, ImageGuided Flashpoint, ARToolKit systems). You have to consider two _limitations_ of the system: (a) the price: cheap compared to HiBall, expensive compared to ARToolKit systems (b) the camera mounting: you have to mount 2..n stationary cameras within your environment to be tracked (calibration of the cameras is no problem, done within a quarter of an hour) Imho, Oliver's problem could also be solved by using the Intersense IS900 system with a couple of strips on the ceiling. But I don't know if the accuracy is sufficient for the Showcase task. hope this helps. Holger R. > Dear Oliver, > > I know that the AR forum is not a PR forum, but I too (as Greg Erdmann > did) would like to give a short "sales statement", that may be valuable > for the AR community. > > A.R.T. is a german company. We produce a passive IR optical tracking > system, "ARTtrack", that has been designed especially for VR/AR > applications and that may fit quite well to your requirements: > > * passive Markers (i.e. wireless) > * supports up to 10 Targets (6dof each; head, interaction device or > other) > * accurate: RMS = 0.25 mm and 0.12 deg in medium sized (3x3m) system > * frame rates up to 60 Hz, delay ca. 25 to 40 ms > * fast and easy to set up > * system size is scalable > * "self made targets" can easily be calibrated and tracked > * can be used with "Crystal Eyes" shutter eyewear > * wireless "Flying Joystick" is available > > I do not know if also the price will fit to your needs: a medium sized > system, that covers a tracking area of about 3 x 3 meters, costs in the > range of $ 50 K. > > For more informations: armin.weiss@a ............. > > Thanks, > Armin Weiss, > A.R.T. GmbH > > > Oliver Bimber: > > > > hi everyone, > > for our Virtual Showcase setups, we're looking for an optical (and other > > wireless) tracking solutions that support head-tracking (but possibly > also > > tracking of interaction devices). For head-tracking, we require 3D > position > > information, only. > > However, for input devices we would need 6DOF. > > The solution should be extendable to support multiple (up to four) users > > simultaneously (we can use multiple networked PCs for this). If optical, > > the solution should not be effected much by the lighting conditions, > > surrounding the setup (e.g. IR or ultra-sonic). > > Finally, it should be fast, stable, precise, cheap, easy to integrate, > easy > > to maintain, robust, and flexible ;-) > > Does anybody know such a system? > > Thanks, > > --oliver > > ps. don't take the last sentence too serious... > > +--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ > > | | |_|_|_|_| Oliver Bimber | URL: http://www.crcg.edu/ | > > | __|__|_|_|_|_| Senior Researcher | EMAIL:obimber@c ....... | > > | | |_|_|_|_| | | > > | __|__|_|_|_|_| Human Media Technologies | | > > | __ _ __ __| Fraunhofer CRCG, Inc. | | > > | / /_// /_ | 321 South Main St. | PH :(+1) 401 453-6363 x124 | > > | /_ / |/_ /_/ | Providence,RI 02903,USA | FAX:(+1) 401 453-0444 | > > +--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ > > > > -- > ___________________________________ > > Armin Weiss > > A.R.T. GmbH > Gewerbestrasse 17 Rgb. > D-82211 Herrsching > > Phone +49-8152-968530 > Fax +49-8152-968501 > e-mail armin.weiss@a ............. > ___________________________________ > > -- Holger Regenbrecht REPLY TO: regenbre@i ......... DaimlerChrysler Research and Technology Virtual Reality Competence Center, Ulm, Germany GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84Ao5.a9zIQj Or send an email To: arforum-unsubscribe@t ......... This email was sent to: webmaster@e ............ T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================ |
From: | Greg Erdmann <gerdmann@a .................> | Received: | Oct 10, 2001 |
To | arforum@t ......... | ||
Subject: | RE: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking | ||
The sensors are connected via thin wire to a small radio pack (the size of a cellphone). -----Original Message----- From: yohan baillot [mailto:baillot@a ...............] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:14 PM To: arforum@t ......... Subject: Re: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking Dear Greg, is your system going to be wireless? can it be adapted to a CAVE? thanks Yohan ___________________________________________ Yohan Baillot VRLab / Naval Research Laboratory 4555 Overlook Avenue SE ______ Code 5580, Room 119A /\ \ Washington DC 20375 / \ \ Phone (202) 404 7801 / \______\ Mobile (703) 732 5679 \ / / Fax (202) 404 1122 \ / / baillot@a ............... \/_____ / http://ait.nrl.navy.mil/people/baillot/ http://ait.nrl.navy.mil/vrlab/projects/BARS/BARS.html ___________________________________________ ----- Original Message ----- From: Greg Erdmann To: arforum@t ......... Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 6:20 AM Subject: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking Oliver (and Yohan): Please excuse me for the brief "sales-oriented" reply, but thought that it would be important for the AR community to know the following exists: Please also consider the fact that Ascension's new ReActor active-optical system is a great system to consider and may "meet" some of your requirements below depending on what your definitions are: 1. fast: report rate up to 120 Hz 2. stable, precise: accuracy +/- 2mm RMS and consistent throughout entire capture volume 3. Cheap: $89K, which includes 540 digital cameras in fixed frame 4. robust: No moving parts, all solid state (no camera lenses) 5. Flexible: Frame size is adjustable See: http://www.ascension-tech.com/products/reactor/ - Greg Erdmann -----Original Message----- From: yohan baillot [mailto:baillot@a ...............] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:23 PM To: arforum@t ......... Subject: Re: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking Dear Oliver, "fast, stable, precise, cheap, easy to integrate, easy to maintain, robust, and flexible" dont go together :) I will recommend Vicon myself for your requirements Then there are wired solutions that are from InterSense and 3DTech. Yohan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Oliver Bimber" <obimber@r .................> To: <arforum@t .........> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 5:30 AM Subject: [ARFORUM] wireless tracking > hi everyone, > for our Virtual Showcase setups, we're looking for an optical (and other > wireless) tracking solutions that support head-tracking (but possibly also > tracking of interaction devices). For head-tracking, we require 3D position > information, only. > However, for input devices we would need 6DOF. > The solution should be extendable to support multiple (up to four) users > simultaneously (we can use multiple networked PCs for this). If optical, > the solution should not be effected much by the lighting conditions, > surrounding the setup (e.g. IR or ultra-sonic). > Finally, it should be fast, stable, precise, cheap, easy to integrate, easy > to maintain, robust, and flexible ;-) > Does anybody know such a system? > Thanks, > --oliver > ps. don't take the last sentence too serious... > +--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ > | | |_|_|_|_| Oliver Bimber | URL: http://www.crcg.edu/ | > | __|__|_|_|_|_| Senior Researcher | EMAIL:obimber@c ....... | > | | |_|_|_|_| | | > | __|__|_|_|_|_| Human Media Technologies | | > | __ _ __ __| Fraunhofer CRCG, Inc. | | > | / /_// /_ | 321 South Main St. | PH :(+1) 401 453-6363 x124 | > | /_ / |/_ /_/ | Providence,RI 02903,USA | FAX:(+1) 401 453-0444 | > +--------------+-------------------------------------------------------+ > > ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84Ao5.a9zINX Or send an email To: arforum-unsubscribe@t ......... This email was sent to: greg@a ................. T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================ Regards, Gregory S. Erdmann Global Account Manager Ascension Technology Corporation PO Box 527, Burlington, VT 05402 USA Tel: (802) 893-6657 Fax: (802) 893-6659 email: greg@a ................. web site: http://www.ascension-tech.com/ ftp site: ftp://ftp.ascension-tech.com/pub/ascension-tech.com/ Magnetic, optical and inertial motion tracking technologies for computer graphics applications. ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84Ao5.a9L2N0 Or send an email To: arforum-unsubscribe@t ......... This email was sent to: gerdmann@a ................. T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================ ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84Ao5.a9zIQj Or send an email To: arforum-unsubscribe@t ......... This email was sent to: webmaster@e ............ T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================ ------=extPart_000_0017_01C150BB.E380CCA0-- |