ARToolKit | Mailing List Archive |
![]() |
From: | Rodney Berry <rodney@a ........> | Received: | Dec 20, 2002 |
To | ARToolkit Mailing list <artoolkit@h ..................> | ||
Subject: | USB2 cameras | ||
http://www.siliconimaging.com/ These also caught my attention whie surfing. Rod. |
From: | Blair MacIntyre <blair@c ............> | Received: | Nov 20, 2004 |
To | "rodney" <rodney@a .....> | ||
Subject: | Re: USB2 cameras | ||
I haven't found any that work well. I also haven't bothered with things like the Grabee because analog cameras are interlaced; the video just doesn't look as good. On Nov 20, 2004, at 6:35 AM, rodney wrote: > Dear all, > > Does anyone have a usb2 camera that they are happy with for the AR > Toolkit? > > I have heard nothing but dissapointment from most people so far. I'm > hoping > to start using one soon and wondering what to buy. > > I have use the GrabeeX usb2 frame-grabber with some success, but not > with > the ARToolkit so far (haven't had a chance to try it yet) I am hoping > for it > to be a cheap way to re-cycle all thos analog cameras everyone > abandoned > when firewire came along. :) > > Rod (ATR Japan). > > > > |
From: | "rodney" <rodney@a .....> | Received: | Nov 20, 2004 |
To | <artoolkit@h ..................> | ||
Subject: | USB2 cameras | ||
Dear all, Does anyone have a usb2 camera that they are happy with for the AR Toolkit? I have heard nothing but dissapointment from most people so far. I'm hoping to start using one soon and wondering what to buy. I have use the GrabeeX usb2 frame-grabber with some success, but not with the ARToolkit so far (haven't had a chance to try it yet) I am hoping for it to be a cheap way to re-cycle all thos analog cameras everyone abandoned when firewire came along. :) Rod (ATR Japan). |
From: | Daniel Wagner <daniel@i ...............> | Received: | Nov 20, 2004 |
To | artoolkit@h .................. | ||
Subject: | Re: USB2 cameras | ||
rodney wrote: >Does anyone have a usb2 camera that they are happy with for the AR Toolkit? > > talking about usb2 cams, i'm quite happy with the Trust 380 SpaceCam. it is cheap, gives 640x480 at 30fps, has a rather low distortion and the image quality is quite good. for 40€ it's a good value... Daniel |
From: | mtw@s ................. | Received: | Nov 20, 2004 |
To | "rodney" <rodney@a .....>, <artoolkit@h ..................> | ||
Subject: | Re: USB2 cameras | ||
hi there, we're using the vrmagic VRmC-3 . its small and can deliver 640x480 with up to 48 hz non interlaced. see http://www.vrmagic.com/vrmtech/camera/vrmc3_e.html for details. its not that cheap i think about 350 EUR. greetings from Michael Am 20 Nov 2004 um 20:35 hat rodney geschrieben: > Dear all, > > Does anyone have a usb2 camera that they are happy with for the AR Toolkit? > > I have heard nothing but dissapointment from most people so far. I'm hoping > to start using one soon and wondering what to buy. > > I have use the GrabeeX usb2 frame-grabber with some success, but not with > the ARToolkit so far (haven't had a chance to try it yet) I am hoping for it > to be a cheap way to re-cycle all thos analog cameras everyone abandoned > when firewire came along. :) > > Rod (ATR Japan). > > > > > |