ARToolKit | Mailing List Archive |
![]() |
From: | "Luca Degli Esposti" <rei_work@l ........> | Received: | Mar 24, 2003 |
To | "AR Mailing List" <artoolkit@h ..................> | ||
Subject: | AR_IMAGE_PROC_IN_HALF | ||
Hi all, I'm making some tests on simplevrml, I've read in ART02 Tutorial that you can use AR_IMAGE_PROC_IN_HALF to use half-size images for marker detection. Trying to improve fps I've changed the DEFAULT_IMAGE_PROC_MODE value from AR_IMAGE_PROC_IN_FULL to AR_IMAGE_PROC_IN_HALF in config.h, I recompiled both the program and libar32.lib, but I see no difference. Can anyone tell me what's wrong and how does AR_PATT_SAMPLE & AR_PATT_SIZE work? I'm using ARToolKitDirectShow2.52vrml on win2000. Thanks Luca |
From: | Hirokazu Kato <kato@s ........................> | Received: | Mar 25, 2003 |
To | "Luca Degli Esposti" <rei_work@l ........> | ||
Subject: | Re: AR_IMAGE_PROC_IN_HALF | ||
Hi, I'm making some tests on simplevrml, I've read in ART02 Tutorial that you can use AR_IMAGE_PROC_IN_HALF to use half-size images for marker detection. Trying to improve fps I've changed the DEFAULT_IMAGE_PROC_MODE value from AR_IMAGE_PROC_IN_FULL to AR_IMAGE_PROC_IN_HALF in config.h, I recompiled both the program and libar32.lib, but I see no difference. Can anyone tell me what's wrong and how does AR_PATT_SAMPLE & AR_PATT_SIZE work? I'm using ARToolKitDirectShow2.52vrml on win2000. Have you tried 'modeTest'? You can interactively change AR_IMAGE_PROC_IN_FULL and AR_IMAGE_PROC_IN_HALF on this program and see the differences between them. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Hirokazu Kato Faculty of Information Sciences Hiroshima City University Phone: +81-82-830-1705 Email: kato@s ........................ Fax: +81-82-830-1435 URL: http://www.sys.im.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp/people/kato/ |