I am pretty sure it is the camera->marker coordinate transformation.
Kasim
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "pablo.estevez@e .............." <estevezp@e ..............>
To: <artoolkit@h ..................>
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 2:43 PM
Subject: Transformation matrix


> Hello,
> I would like to know if the "double trans[3][4]" parameter of
> arGetTransMat function is a tranformation matrix from the marker
> coordinates to the camera coodinates or a projection matrix to the camera
> screen coordinates.
> 
> Thank you everybody
> 
> 
> Pablo
> 
> 

I meant marker->camera.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kasim Rehman" <kr241@c ........>
To: "pablo.estevez@e .............." <estevezp@e ..............>;
<artoolkit@h ..................>
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: Transformation matrix


> I am pretty sure it is the camera->marker coordinate transformation.
> Kasim
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "pablo.estevez@e .............." <estevezp@e ..............>
> To: <artoolkit@h ..................>
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 2:43 PM
> Subject: Transformation matrix
>
>
> > Hello,
> > I would like to know if the "double trans[3][4]" parameter of
> > arGetTransMat function is a tranformation matrix from the marker
> > coordinates to the camera coodinates or a projection matrix to the
camera
> > screen coordinates.
> >
> > Thank you everybody
> >
> >
> > Pablo
> >
> >
>

Hello,
I would like to know if the "double trans[3][4]" parameter of
arGetTransMat function is a tranformation matrix from the marker
coordinates to the camera coodinates or a projection matrix to the camera
screen coordinates.

Thank you everybody


Pablo

Thank you, I wasn't sure about that :)

Pablo

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Kasim Rehman wrote:

> I meant marker->camera.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kasim Rehman" <kr241@c ........>
> To: "pablo.estevez@e .............." <estevezp@e ..............>;
> <artoolkit@h ..................>
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 2:54 PM
> Subject: Re: Transformation matrix
>
>
> > I am pretty sure it is the camera->marker coordinate transformation.
> > Kasim
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "pablo.estevez@e .............." <estevezp@e ..............>
> > To: <artoolkit@h ..................>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 2:43 PM
> > Subject: Transformation matrix
> >
> >
> > > Hello,
> > > I would like to know if the "double trans[3][4]" parameter of
> > > arGetTransMat function is a tranformation matrix from the marker
> > > coordinates to the camera coodinates or a projection matrix to the
> camera
> > > screen coordinates.
> > >
> > > Thank you everybody
> > >
> > >
> > > Pablo
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>